Saturday, June 29, 2013

Walking in the Footsteps of the Eleventh Corps



I arrived in Gettysburg this afternoon just in time to take part in a two-hour battlefield walk presented by park ranger Chris Gwinn. Gwinn walked about 70 of us up and down the 11th Corps line on July 1st, and explained its collapse. The tour was great, and Gwinn convincingly argued that the corps had a hopeless task on July 1st, and that many fought bravely, despite the reputation that they have acquired.

Town is busy - though many of the tourists today seemed to be out at the reenactment. So far - there have been plenty of quite spots to find on the battlefield. With a bit of daylight left I have found a spot near Father Corby and I intend to break open Coddington to read about the attack of Willard's brigade to conclude the day.

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

72nd PA Monument Update: It's Back Up!

Fast work by the Park Service - the statue on the 72nd Monument - which was damaged in last night's storm in Gettysburg - was back up this afternoon, though the soldier now sports a bent musket. Michael Waricher's got some neat photos of the restoration on his facebook page.

News and Notes: Storm Takes Down the 72nd PA Monument

The big Gettysburg anniversary is nearly here. I'll be down in Gettysburg for part of it (I can only stay through mid-day on July 2nd). I will have some twitter updates, and I plan on posting a blog or two about my experiences when I return. I also have a few posts lined up that will go live during the anniversary. While I am in the Gettysburg area I will be participating in a special event in Bendersville to honor the veterans of Company G, 138th Pennsylvania. If you are looking for an event that gets you away from the crowds, be sure to check it out.

Unfortunately, on the eve of the anniversary the battlefield suffered some storm damage last night. Several trees were knocked down around the copse, but the most significant damage was done to the 72nd Pennsylvania monument, whose bronze statue was knocked off of its perch. You can view some photographs here. No word yet on the extent of the damage, nor when it will be repaired.

I hope everyone going to the events of the next week has a great time, and maybe I'll see a few of you there!

Saturday, June 22, 2013

Guarding Trains No More

More on the 138th Pennsylvania

From the start of their service in September of 1862, the men of the 138th Pennsylvania saw little action. After organizing at Camp Curtin in Harrisburg, the regiment moved down to Relay House, a junction on the B&O Railroad outside of Baltimore. For the next ten months, the regiment performed the vital if unglamorous duty of guarding the railroad from guerrillas and rebel incursions. For some of the men in the Adam's County companies - B&G - this duty became tiresome. In January of 1863, one soldier - identified as Typo - wrote to Gettysburg's Star and Banner newspaper, and complained that the men longed to see action. "They are anxious to be led forward," he wrote, "where they cannot only win laurels for themselves but help their brethren in arms to put a speedy end to this most wicked rebellion." The Gettysburg Campaign would provide the necessary shakeup to make Typo's wish come true.

In the dead of night on June 13th, the soldiers of the 138th awoke to the sounds of the long roll, and they were ordered to throw out a picket line to receive an expected cavalry raid. No enemy appeared, but on the succeeding two nights the regiment received orders to keep a close watch again. Milroy's command had gone to pieces at Winchester, and wild rumors came down the valley, and spread into Maryland and Pennsylvania. The rebel army was on the march.

On June 16th, the regiment received orders to move out. At about ten in the evening, the men boarded railroad cars. "We were left under the impression that we were only going on a scout," Typo reported. He soon found otherwise. The train arrived at Sandy Hook, Maryland. From here the regiment marched to Harper's Ferry. It was a short march, but it was fatiguing for the "Sunday Soldiers," who had seen only guard duty.

By this time Union authorities were aware of the approach of Lee's army, and despaired of holding Harper's Ferry. The 138th, and the rest of the garrison were positioned on Maryland Heights, a mountain rising on the Maryland shore opposite Harper's Ferry, and federal forces began to evacuate supplies and equipment from the south side of the Potomac. Over the next several days the men of the 138th remained constantly on picket on the heights, expecting a fight at any moment. At night rebel campfires could be spied through telescopes. Each day the troops fell in under arms by 3:00 a.m. The soldiers felt as if they had been instantly transformed from dull garrison troops into hardy campaigners. "We were playing soldier for 10 long months," Typo recorded, "and now we are experiencing reality."

The Confederate army was close, but Robert E. Lee had bagged a federal garrison at Harper's Ferry before, and it nearly cost him dearly. This time, he would bypass these troops and head straight for Pennsylvania. The 138th would need to wait a bit longer to truly experience reality. But for the families of those soldiers serving in Company B, reality was swiftly heading toward their front doorsteps.

Wednesday, June 19, 2013

The Diaries of a Civil War Soldier



Last week I sat down with Dr. Will Walker, co-editor of New York History, for a brief chat about some of the primary sources I used in my recent article, "Love at War: The Civil War Courtship of John L. Hoster and Josephine Cole." The article appeared in the latest issue of New York History, which is a special issue on New York in the Civil War.

If you would like to check out the issue, the New York State Historical Association has graciously granted me the opportunity to offer my blog readers a limited-time opportunity to obtain a free copy of this issue. All you have to do is send an email request to publications@nysha.org, and they will email you a PDF copy. In case you missed my previous post about it, here is the full table of contents:

"Editors' Introduction"
F. Daniel Larkin, Thomas D. Beal, William S. Walker

"Purveying Patriotic Pageantry: The Civil War Sanitary Fairs in New York"
Lorraine Madway

"Love at War: The Civil War Courtship of John L. Hoster and Josephine Cole"
Stephen H. Light

Book Reviews
Review Essay: Race in Nineteenth-Century New York City by Scott Nichols, including:

Peterson, Black Gotham: A Family History of African Americans in Nineteenth-Century New York City

Hodges, David Ruggles: A Radical Black Abolitionist and the Underground Railroad in New York City

Alexander, African or American? Black Identity and Political Activism in New York City, 1784-1861
Books Reviewed
Spann, Gotham at War: New York City, 1860-1865, Reviewed by Thomas D. Beal
Dobak, Freedom by the Sword: The U.S. Colored Troops 1862-1867, Reviewed by Hari Jones
Seraile, Angels of Mercy: White Women and the History of New York's Colored Orphan's Asylum, Reviewed by Edythe Ann Quinn

Tuesday, June 18, 2013

Bendersville Event to Honor Company G, 138th Pennsylvania on June 30

As a Gettysburg College History major in 2005, my senior seminar focused on the Battle of Gettysburg and the Gettysburg community during the Civil War. The class was taught by legendary professor Gabor S. Boritt. My thesis topic did not focus on the battle, but rather on the 138th Pennsylvania, a three-years regiment recruited in the summer of 1862. In fact, I narrowed my focus further by exploring two companies in particular - Company B, recruited in Gettysburg, and Company G, recruited in Bendersville and Heidlersburg. My final paper presented a narrative history of these two companies, largely built on manuscript sources at the Adams County Historical Society, and on the frequent letters printed in Gettysburg newspapers from members of the two companies during the war.

After I graduated, I was able to post my thesis online as an article at militaryhistoryonline.com. Over the years I've had email inquiries related to the project, and granted permission to others to post it on a few websites. More recently, I've pulled the thesis out of my files and used it as the basis for a few blog posts and further research into the story the 138th over the past year. But I was not necessarily prepared for the inquiry I received a few weeks back from Debra Sandoe McCauslin. Debra operates For the Cause Productions, which offers specialized programs and tours on local history in Adams County.

Debra's ancestor, David Slaybaugh, served in Company G. Exploring Slaybaugh's story, she came across my article. She also realized that many residents of Bendersville and Adams County as a whole have family connections to the 138th. She decided that these soldiers deserved to be remembered, and that the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg was a fitting time to do it. In many ways, it is very fitting. The 138th did not fight at Gettysburg, though it was added to the Army of the Potomac during its pursuit of Lee after the battle. And the commemorative landscape of Gettysburg has a long history of serving not just as the place to honor those who fought at Gettysburg, but as the memorial field of the Army of the Potomac.

And so, on Sunday, June 30th - as the nation's eyes turn to Gettysburg's commemoration of the largest battle of the Civil War, McCauslin has put together a special program in Bendersville honoring the men of Company G, 138th Pennsylvania. The program will begin at 1:00 p.m. at the Bethlehem Lutheran Church on Church Street. Several veterans from the regiment are buried in the church's graveyard. Descendants of the veterans of Company G are encouraged to attend.

I am honored that Debra has asked me to attend and provide a brief overview of the history of the regiment. If you plan on attending the Battle anniversary, but are looking to get away from some of the major crowds, consider stopping by this unique, and free, event honoring the memory of the soldiers of Company G - many of whom grew up in Gettysburg's backyard, but lost their lives on distant Virginia battlefields.

Thursday, June 13, 2013

"Nothing but a Vast Road" - 150 Years Ago This Week

14th Brooklyn monument at Gettysburg. Photo by Ron Zanoni. Creative Commons Licensing.
As the month of June wore on, Fighting Joe Hooker continued to grapple with a vexing question: just where was his counterpart, Robert E. Lee, heading? Despite later claims to the contrary, the cavalry fight at Brandy Station had not revealed Lee's hand to the Army of the Potomac commander. By June 13, two competing possibilities still loomed large in Hooker's mind: (1) that a major cavalry raid led by J.E.B. Stuart was in the offing, and (2) that Lee intended to move his army toward the Shenandoah Valley en route to the Potomac River, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. Finally, the 13th brought concrete intelligence that would allow Hooker to make up his mind. Word arrived at headquarters that two rebel corps had passed through Sperryville headed in the direction of the Valley. This news stirred headquarters into action, and soon a circular went out to each corps: "This army," relayed Assistant Adjutant-General Seth Williams, "will be transferred from this line to the Orange and Alexandria Railroad." The great pursuit began. That evening, at around 7 p.m., Hooker composed a dispatch to Major General Halleck in Washington, informing his superior of his intention of abandoning the line along the Rappahannock in order to better cover Washington D.C.

Lee had stolen a march on Hooker, and now his army faced the possibility of being cut off from Washington. With a blistering June heat wave baking the roads of Virginia, only hard marching could now remedy the situation. On June 18th, a member of the nattily attired 14th Brooklyn took a brief moment to update his hometown paper. "I suppose you know by this time..." he began, "that our army has moved." He went on to describe the forced marches that he and his comrades had recently endured:
The General put us through this day, marching us two and three miles at a time through the hot sun, without a rest. Our doctor was put under arrest for giving so many passes to the men who were "played out".... We have marched over 95 miles since we have started, through dust six inches deep and the sun coming down red hot. You could fill a canteen with cold water and in ten minutes time it would be like hot water. A great many officers and men were sun struck on the route. One of Gen. Wadsworth's staff fell off his horse sun struck.
This hard marching brought the Army of the Potomac northward in order to prevent a sudden Confederate thrust toward Washington. It could not however, save the surprised Federal garrison at Winchester. On the afternoon of June 14th, Joseph Hooker received an ominous telegraph from Washington:
Major-General Hooker:
Do you consider it possible that 15,000 of Ewell's men can now be at Winchester?
A. Lincoln
It was possible, as General Robert H. Milroy was finding out that very day. As his scattered command disintegrated in the face of Richard Ewell's onslaught, the realities of a Confederate invasion began to set in across the north. In Pennsylvania,  Governor Curtin had already called for the organization of a homeguard militia. Yet militia alone would not be enough to stop the vaunted Lee. For the veterans of the Army of the Potomac, the march would continue. On June 21, our Brooklyn solider would take pen in hand again as he marked time near Gilford Station in Loudon County, Virginia. "The part of Virginia we are now in is splendid," he recorded, "but the parts we came through to get here were awful; nothing but a vast road."

Soon, the 14th Brooklyn would leave war-ravaged Virginia behind for the rolling farmlands of southern Pennsylvania.

-------
A note on sources: The quotations provided here were obtained through the 14th Brooklyn's Civil War newspaper clippings file available online as part of the excellent website run by the New York State Military Museum and Veterans Research Center

Tuesday, June 11, 2013

More Last Invasion Commentary: Guelzo Takes on Meade

I continue to plug away at Allen Guelzo's Gettysburg: The Last Invasion. The book is well written, and I am gleaning bits of new information here and there, but I'm most interested in getting into some of Guelzo's unique interpretations. For some time now I've understood from his writings, lectures, and other sources that Guelzo is no fan of George Gordon Meade, and I anticipate that he will lay out his full case against Meade throughout this book. While I haven't even made it to July 1st yet, I find that Guelzo's bias shows through quite readily.

I don't necessarily mind bias, as long as it is backed up with evidence. Every historian writes with his or her own point of view. In a few locations in the book though, I have run across a practice that I do find annoying: the art of twisting historical quotations to fit a particular storyline. Just this evening I ran across a prime example. In his telling of Lee's discovery that Meade had taken command of the Army of the Potomac, Guelzo writes the following:
He appraised Meade with remarkable accuracy when he remarked that "General Meade will commit no blunder in my front, and if I commit one he will make haste to take advantage of it"--an elegant way of saying that George Meade would likely do nothing rather than run the risk of doing something.
As I interpret it, this frequently used quote from General Lee seems to convey a completely opposite meaning from the one that Guelzo spells out for his readers. Guelzo's interpretation fits his own vision of Meade more than it fits the actual words he's interpreting.

What do you think?

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Was Lee Committed to Virginia more than the Confederacy?

I picked up Allen C. Guelzo's new book, The Last Invasion, from the library yesterday, and spent some time this afternoon diving in. I have heard many things about the book, and I am anxious to read some of Professor Guelzo's more unique interpretations. Many would question the need for yet another full length study of the Gettysburg Campaign, but in reading the first fifty pages or so it seems like this book is set up to offer something new. When I finish, I will post a review comparing it to some of my favorite full length campaign studies.

But as I read along, I thought I would toss out some interest passages here and there and open it up for discussion. I came across my first discussion point fairly quickly. In describing Lee's opposition to sending reinforcements west, Professor Guelzo argues:
Robert E. Lee had thrown away a lifelong career, thrown away, in fact, an oath sworn on his honor, for the sake of Virginia and all of the Virginians like his Carter cousins--"my relatives, my children, my home." Virginia was his all, and Virginia's success was the only hope he had of recouping all he had ventured for the Old Dominion's sake. What he would not give up for Winfield Scott and Abraham Lincoln, he was certainly not going to endanger for the sake of Jefferson Davis and James A. Seddon. "Save in defense of my native State, I never desire again to draw my sword"--those words, which Lee wrote to Scott back in the springtime of the war, had as much application to the Richmond government as to Winfield Scott.
What do you think? Did Lee's loyalty to Virginia influence the making of his strategy in May and June of 1863? And did he choose to invade the North because it was good for the Confederacy, or because it was good for Virginia?

Thursday, June 6, 2013

New York History Releases a Special Civil War Issue

New York History, the New York State Historical Association's digital quarterly journal, has just released a brand new issue focused on New York in the Civil War. Given the state's role in the Union war effort - over 448,000 New Yorkers enlisted in the armed services and about 50,000 died - it's a fitting theme to explore. This is especially true as we near the 150th anniversary of a moment when the realities of war came home to the state: the New York City Draft Riots. On a personal note, I am excited and proud to say that my first published article, Love at War: The Civil War Courtship of John L. Hoster and Josephine Cole appears in this issue. The other articles look great, and I'm looking forward to giving it a read.

If you would like to check it out, the New York State Historical Association has graciously granted me the opportunity to offer my blog readers a limited-time opportunity to obtain a free copy of this issue. All you have to do is send an email request to publications@nysha.org, and they will email you a PDF copy. Here is the full table of contents:

"Editors' Introduction"
F. Daniel Larkin, Thomas D. Beal, William S. Walker

"Purveying Patriotic Pageantry: The Civil War Sanitary Fairs in New York"
Lorraine Madway

"Love at War: The Civil War Courtship of John L. Hoster and Josephine Cole"
Stephen H. Light

Book Reviews
Review Essay: Race in Nineteenth-Century New York City by Scott Nichols, including:
Peterson, Black Gotham: A Family History of African Americans in Nineteenth-Century New York City

Hodges, David Ruggles: A Radical Black Abolitionist and the Underground Railroad in New York City

Alexander, African or American? Black Identity and Political Activism in New York City, 1784-1861
Books Reviewed
Spann, Gotham at War: New York City, 1860-1865, Reviewed by Thomas D. Beal
Dobak, Freedom by the Sword: The U.S. Colored Troops 1862-1867, Reviewed by Hari Jones
Seraile, Angels of Mercy: White Women and the History of New York's Colored Orphan's Asylum, Reviewed by Edythe Ann Quinn


Monday, June 3, 2013

150 Years Ago This Week: The Campaign Began

The town of Gettysburg in July, 1863. Image by Mathew Brady, Image source: New York Public Library Digital Gallery.

By June of 1863, the citizens of Gettysburg, Pennsylvania had lived with war for two years. Many of the residents had seen their sons march off to fight in several regiments, including the 1st Pennsylvania Reserves, the 87th Pennsylvania, and the 138th Pennsylvania. Some of these soldiers had already returned in coffins, or rested in distant graves. While somewhat removed from the major scenes of conflict in Virginia, from the early days of the war Gettysburgians had demonstrated a keen awareness of their proximity to the Potomac River and their vulnerability to Confederate excursions into the North. In the fall of 1862, their fears nearly became a reality during Lee's invasion of Maryland. During that campaign, federal cavalry from the Army of the Potomac occupied the town for a day and a half. In October of 1862, Confederate cavalry under J.E.B. Stuart had approached to within six miles of Gettysburg on a raid. Once again, Union cavalry arrived in town. Despite these close calls, more often than not rumors were just that, and while Gettysburgians continued to fear the potential of a Rebel invasion, the prospect seemed unlikely in June of 1863.

War news continued to dominate the pages of the local newspapers in Gettysburg as residents prepared for summer. The draft was coming, and on June 2nd The Sentinel led off its page two news items with full details. "A draft for 300,000 men will shortly be ordered by the President for the purpose of filling up the old regiments" the paper reported. The Sentinel, with its Republican bent, supported the Conscription Act, and noted that "many friends of the Union are impatient at the delay in ordering a draft."

The citizens of Gettysburg also closely followed news from the front. In early June, all eyes were on Vicksburg. The Sentinel reported that Grant's siege was progressing well, but that the Rebel troops in the city were holding out bravely, and hoped for relief from forces under command of General Joseph Johnston. "We cannot tell what a day may bring forth," the editor related. Meanwhile, wild rumors of Rebel movements in Virginia had begun to circulate. In the very same June 2nd edition, The Sentinel attempted to discredit some of these whispers. For many days people had talked of a Rebel advance down the Shenandoah Valley. "From the latest accounts up to night before last," The Sentinel explained, "the whole affair was the act of a few straggling guerillas-some of whom were caught." Contrary to the rumors, no enemy had been found within ten miles of Harper's Ferry.

Indeed, on June 2nd, Lee's army remained in its camp south of the Rappahannock River. But it would not stay for long. On Wednesday, June 3rd, the Army of Northern Virginia began to pull away from the vicinity of Fredericksburg. The First Corps divisions of Lafayette McLaws and John Bell Hood were the first to go. On Thursday, Robert Rodes' division followed, and on Friday, June 5th, the rest of Ewell's Second Corps took up the march. They would move towards Culpeper Court House, and thence toward the Shenandoah Valley. By June 5th, Major General Joseph Hooker had concluded that Lee was attempting to move north to the Potomac River, or to cut him off from Washington. By June 6th, he would have word of a Confederate column at Culpeper Court House, and the following afternoon he would issue orders to cavalry chief Alfred Pleasonton to take all of his cavalry and 3,000 infantry across the Rappahannock to destroy these forces. The Gettysburg Campaign had begun.

Many miles to the north, Gettysburgians worried about the progress of the war, and the safety of their loved ones in the army. Yet none of them could imagine how drastically the war would change their lives in just one month.

Sunday, June 2, 2013

On Campaign with the NPS

With the 150th anniversary of the Gettysburg Campaign commencing tomorrow, Gettysburg National Military Park has begun to roll out some of its online offerings, including a "On Campaign" Youtube series. Below, you will find Ranger Chris Gwinn discussing the aftermath of the Battle of Chancellorsville at Falmouth, Virginia.

You can find the full series by clicking here.